Monday, September 27, 2010
Sunday, September 26, 2010
Friday, September 24, 2010
Journey to nowhere
in Tirupur and Usilampatti
|It is an “out of the frying pan, into the fire” experience for many who flock to Tirupur from across Tamil Nadu.|
The row houses in Tirupur where the migrant workers of the garment industry stay.
K. SUBRAMANIA PILLAI was at the end of his tether. “Around 32 years have rolled by since I came to Tirupur. But I can't see any progress in my life…. The unpaid debt has accumulated to Rs.21,660 as on July 5, 2010…. I have been under severe stress for the past four months as I find no way to clear the debt. I do not want to live any more either, as I am unable to bear the humiliation. All my efforts to find a way out have failed…. I am just commencing my journey without a destination in mind. I have no problem with my children. My humble request is to find a good bridegroom for my youngest daughter,” wrote the 75-year-old man in a note he posted to his son, S. Kaliappan, who lived at S. Periyapalayam on the outskirts of Tirupur. His body was found two kilometres away from S. Periyapalayam a couple of days later.
READ FULL ARTICLE IN
( sep 25 to oct 8- 2010)
Thursday, September 23, 2010
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Friday, September 17, 2010
Hunger manifests itself in so many forms, be it farmers' suicide, decline in per capita availability of food grains, children surviving without a drop of milk, 70-year-olds pleading for a job in scorching heat in the hinterlands, but the Centre has no money for universal public distribution system, said P. Sainath, Rural Affairs Editor, The Hindu.
In his talk on ‘Slumdogs Vs millionaires: Farm crisis and food crisis in the age of inequality' organised by Indian School of Social Sciences in the city on Friday, Mr. Sainath said: “This meeting is for three hours. In three hours, 51 Indian children die of malnourishment and 6 farmers commit suicide and the Centre writes off Rs.171 crore in tax to corporates.”
To implement universal PDS on the lines of Kerala and Tamil Nadu, the Centre needs Rs.90,000 crore. This year, the corporate income tax exemption was Rs.80,000 crore. The exemption from tax to corporates has grown every year from 1991. This is apart from the subsidy by way of SEZs, loans, credits, power and water. The Centre, however, has no money for universal PDS, he said. The Prime Minister who was passionate about the (Indo-U.S.) nuclear deal and who threatened to resign in Parliament for the deal has no passion or even the inclination to perform as a Prime Minister to feed the hungry.
On rising inequality, Mr. Sainath said the city of Mumbai's latest tourist attraction was a monument built for one family at a cost of $2 billion of a man tipped to be the richest man in the world in another five years. Half of the same city's population lived in slums and 76 per cent who lived in formal houses lived in one-room tenements, he said.
Three official committees have clearly revealed that rural poverty was much higher and that 836 million in the country earned less than Rs.20 per day. As much as 86 per cent of all Dalits and Adivasis and 85 per cent of all Muslims were in the grip of poverty. The farmers who produce food have no food security. While the monthly per capita expenditure of a farm household was Rs.503, the family spends 60 per cent of it on food. The farmers have no control over seeds, pesticides, fertilizers, power, water or the prices. “This is hunger,” he said.
The suicide of the farmers was only the consequence of a crisis, the outcome, not the origin. The corporate highjack of farming and the wrong agricultural policies of the Centre and State governments are the reasons, Mr. Sainath said, urging the Indian intelligentsia to reconnect with the masses to safeguard democracy.
Thursday, September 16, 2010
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
What is Right with the CPI (M)
Sep 7th 2010, Prabhat Patnaik
Much is being written these days, especially in the context of West Bengal, about what is wrong with the CPI (M). For a Party that has been in power in the state for more than three decades, this is hardly surprising. But if a Party has been in power in a state for more than three decades, then something must also be right with it. Besides, no matter what the outcome of the forthcoming Assembly elections, it would still be the case that almost half of the electorate in the two most intellectually-advanced states in India, West Bengal and Kerala, would have voted in them for CPI (M)-led formations. What explains this, and also the fact that, notwithstanding all its omissions and commissions, the CPI (M) still continues to attract some of the finest young minds of the country?
The answer is three-fold (and everything I say about the CPI (M) holds generally for the organized Left as a whole): first, it is the only modern force in Indian politics; second, it is the only consistently democratic force in Indian politics; and third, it is the only consistently anti-imperialist force in Indian politics.
Of the two main non-Left political formations in the country, one appeals to Hindutva, and the other appeals to the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty. Both thrive on the essentially feudal features of our society. The CPI (M) by contrast does not owe its being to the identity of Prakash Karat's grandfather, or of Sitaram Yechury's father-in-law. It represents in that sense the only residual link to the modernity of the anti-colonial struggle. The Congress Party, which retained the leadership of the anti-colonial struggle throughout its course, was largely a modern force during that struggle and for a while even after independence; the leaders were more or less equal, debate was free, and sycophancy, let alone dynastic politics, conspicuous by its absence; dynastic politics entered the Congress party at a later date. The Hindutva group, by contrast, never had anything to do with the anti-colonial struggle; its political formation always was, and still remains, a front for an organization that is fundamentally pre-modern in its orientation and appeal. But while modernity was absent from the one and abandoned by the other, it still characterizes the CPI (M) as a political force.
Both the non-Left formations have also at different times sought to abrogate the democratic nature of our polity. The Congress Party imposed upon this country the infamous Emergency which ended only because of a miscalculation on its part and not because of any change of heart (indeed to this day it still has not expressed any contrition on this score). And the Hindutva formation toyed for long with the idea of altering the Constitution of the country and even set up a Commission to suggest recommendations for doing so, until President K.R. Narayanan stepped in to end that effort. The CPI (M) was in the forefront of opposition on both these occasions (though the CPI transgressed on the earlier occasion, for which it later made a self-criticism). The CPI (M)'s systematic defence of the democratic rights of the people has paradoxically been somewhat belied by its own reticence to theorize about the nature of democracy in societies like ours, and by the pervasive association, derived from historical experience but lacking any theoretical justification, of communism with one-Party rule; but this defence has been as steadfast as it has been forceful. By contrast, on the issue of secularism, where the Party, free of any historical baggage, has been more forthright in theorizing its praxis, its role in defending secularism has been more widely acknowledged.
Critics often point to this or that misdemeanour on the part of the CPI (M) cadre, this or that action on the part of CPI (M) ''hoodlums'' to contest CPI (M)'s commitment to democracy. But even if each of the alleged misdemeanours happens to be true, it would be crass empiricism (or alternatively, what comes to the same thing, crass moralism) to deny the CPI (M)'s historical commitment to democracy from a set of individual incidents, of the sort that all political formations at the ground level can be accused of.
But even more significant than the two features mentioned above, is the CPI (M)'s commitment to consistent anti-imperialism, which indeed constitutes its real differentia specifica. Imperialism is more than ''the empire''; and anti-imperialism is more than mere Bush-bashing, or opposition to the Israeli shenanigans in Palestine or American shenanigans in Iraq and Afghanistan. Anti-imperialism in short is not moral opposition to this or that venture on the part of the hegemonic power of the time; it is a whole approach to politics that sees every issue of the day from the perspective of globally-spanning class relations of domination and subordination. And the CPI (M), and the Left in general, is the only force in India, that does so consistently. It sees the Indo-US nuclear deal not just as a ''nuclear deal'' but above all as an ''Indo-US deal''. It evaluates the deal not in terms of the costs and benefits of nuclear power (though the deal is questionable even on this score), but in terms of what it portends for India's relationship with US imperialism.
Many would not agree with what they would see as the CPI (M)'s ''obsession'' with imperialism, an ''obsession'' that even made it withdraw support from the UPA government, despite the obvious short-term political costs of that withdrawal. Many would not even subscribe to the concept of ''imperialism'' itself, the most radical among them remaining satisfied with the concept of the ''empire'' or the ''evil empire''. But if one sees imperialism as a global system and not just as the evil actions of this or that US President, then one cannot help admiring a Party that can stake its everything on a principled opposition to the Indo-US nuclear deal. Indeed its very lack of ''pragmatism'' that characterized its total opposition to the deal, which political pundits and commentators to this day have seen as sheer ''folly'', is what marks it out as a political Party and endears it to thousands who do subscribe to the concept of imperialism. It is this consistent and principled anti-imperialism on its part that makes writers like Noam Chomsky feel concerned when ''progressive'' sections in India launch a no-holds-barred attack on the CPI (M).
The ultra-Left is at best lackadaisical in its anti-imperialism. What it thinks on a whole range of issues concerned with imperialism today is anybody's guess (buried perhaps in arcane pamphlets). And the fact that it treats the CPI (M), which is a consistent anti-imperialist force, as its main enemy, suggests the secondary role at best that it assigns to imperialism in its calculations, highlighting once more the difference between it and the CPI (M) on the issue of imperialism.
The central question of the last hundred years has been the nature of the modernity brought by imperialism to the periphery. The national movement was fought on this issue. The progressive elements of the national movement who split off to form the Communist Party believed that authentic modernity could come only by an alternative route, socialism. While the promise of socialism has been belied for the moment, and many (including perhaps even Amartya Sen) have seen in neo-liberalism the promise of a progressive modernity, the CPI (M) has never given up its perspective on imperialism, has seen in neo-liberalism the form that imperialism takes in the current epoch, and has continued (notwithstanding a passing phase of naïve ''developmentalism'' in West Bengal for which it has been self-critical) to hold up a vision of an alternative anti-imperialist modernity. Anti-imperialism, it believes, is not a ''fundamentalist'' but a modernist position. And that in my view is what is right about the CPI (M).
dear comrade, i had the opportunity to attend the procession & inaugural session at tagore hall, kozhikode. the procession was massive and that itself showed the commitment of our comrades towards our association. i am from coimbatore and when our All India Gen.Sec. commended our division along with other 2 divisions, in his speech, we felt very proud. another feather on the cap of our divisional leadership. com.thomas issac's deep knowledge in economy raised my hair. HATS OFF TO OUR KOZHIKODE COMRADES FOR THEIR SUPERB ARRANGEMENTS INSPITE OF MANY CONSTRAINTS. WE THANK THEM FROM THE BOTTOM OF OUR HEART FOR THEIR HOSPITALITY. we saw senior comrades supplying drinking water all the way through the procession. THANK U COMRADES. PROUD TO BE AN AIIEA MEMBER - N.RAVINDRANATH